NLP Meta Programs, by John David Hoag. Advanced patterns of thinking that control what you perceive - - and how to change them. Toward vs. Away- From. In this Meta Program, a person's attention is directed either toward what they want or away from what they don't want. It also applies to a person's ability to know what they want in the first place. It is related to the . Worst- Case Scenario Thinking. That is, someone using toward thinking will likely also be using best- case scenario thinking. However, it is possible for a person to have an away from best- case combination if one begins with a worst- case Meta Program, since the person might consider best- case scenarios to be unrealistic. When a person is in a state of having a problem, it is common that they will think and express themselves in terms of what they don't want. They don't want the problem. But that's not all they don't want. Rather, it's that when they think about what they want they use an . Over time, a predominant transcontextual use of away from thinking may lead a person to conclude that the positive is impossible (or highly unlikely) - - since the person consistently deletes it from perception. They may lose hope and stop trying for a life they would really want and enjoy. Other problems related to the overuse, or context inappropriate use, of an . An example would be a person whose goal is to . So away- from goals tend to produce inconsistent, on- off, see- sawing motivation. The problem here is that they may not recognize what they do want when they finally encounter it because their mental processes are preoccupied with identifying what they don't want. Additionally, if a person assumes that there is more of what they don't want out there in the world, and less of what they do want, then away- from thinking is the least efficient mode of attentional selection since they would have to sort through the larger number of negatives in the hope of finding a positive. It would be more efficient to perceive and identify the positives - - selecting them directly. How Much Weight Should I Lose On Hcg Drops How to Lose Weight Fast Glucose Intolerance Diet Prediabetes Eca Side Effects Bulk Buying Sites What Is The Best Fat Loss Supplement Best Most Effective Diet @ Glucose Intolerance Diet. As much as half of the energy used in your home goes to heating and cooling. So making smart decisions about your home's heating, ventilating, and air conditioning. Secure Communities was an immigration enforcement program administered by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) from 2008 to 2014. The program was replaced. If the . On the other hand, if the . In that case, everything would be presupposed to be negative and it might be more useful to correct the Meta Model Universal Quantifier (. The downside of this process is that it directs a person's attention consistently to the negatives in their experience, filtering out the positives in the process. The effect is that a person sees a lot of negatives in their world and they may draw appropriately (given their perceptions) pessimistic conclusions. Yet, those conclusions may not be justified by a fuller representation of events and choices. So, by looking for what they don't want, a person will keep finding what they don't want. If a person's goal were to make themselves unhappy, this would be a good way to do it. Gold Alternative Farming Systems Information Center National Agricultural Library U.S. Department of Agriculture Ask a Question. Community Web site for U.S. Independent Beauty Consultants with tools to manage a Mary Kay business. Login or learn more about the Mary Kay career opportunity. Excite and engage your learners; improve retention of information; add character to your courses; own the content you create; create movies yourself; from $1,995 / year. The . A person who is using this Meta Program may have difficulty remembering positive experiences and select, from all their past experiences, only those which are negative, thus constructing a life history which presents a very sad or unsatisfactory story, despite the fact that many good things did occur. Likewise, they may come to expect negative events to occur in the future (e. However, some of the most successful people cite it as a factor in their success (via focusing their attention on the positive) and many cite anecdotal evidence in their own lives in support of its veracity. There may yet be something to it, or it may simply be the effect of positive self- fulfilling prophesy: see the positive, expect the positive, and you are more likely to produce the positive through your positive attitude and actions. Or it could be a little of both. American society, with its traditional . Most products benefit from a thorough and critical review which seeks to find, identify and fix problems before the product goes to market. People with strong skills in the use of the . Another example would be military combat planning which necessarily includes considerable away- from thinking. By 'default' I mean that in the absence of specifically identified contexts in which away- from thinking is consciously considered advantageous, a . The positive, life affirming effects of this level of change are profound. For setting goals and direction, the . Toward thinking is, in fact, so important to setting effective goals, that one of the primary conditions for . When a person is sorting for what they positively want, they are enabled the freedom to fully imagine it, design for it, set direction for it, follow through, achieve it, and experience its rewards. The downside of overusing the . An example would be the giddiness of 'blue sky' corporate board retreats where the participants get very creative about the company's future direction, products or organization without fully vetting the ideas with necessary away from critical thinking. In such cases the executives may return to the offices with directives which make little or no business sense and insist that employees execute them. If employees make rational objections to the new plans, they may be told somewhat ominously that they are not . The ability to choose and run a given Meta Program intentionally as most appropriate to the circumstances is a powerful addition to anyone's personal skill set. In cases where the Meta Program is the only pattern at issue, it can literally make the difference between a happy or miserable experience of life. Self Reference vs. Other Reference. In this Meta Program, a person's attention references either oneself or another. Like other Meta Programs, the operation and use of self/other referencing is generally non- conscious though its effects may be keenly felt. Self Reference is the selection of evidence and criteria based on reference to one's own perceptions, beliefs, values, etc. It is related both to self- confidence, at the healthy end of the spectrum, and sociopathy at the other end. As an example, if a person using Self Referencing is asked how they know when they've done a good job at work, they might say something like, . It is related both to compassion, at the healthy end of the spectrum, and co- dependence at the other end. For example, if a person using Other Referencing is asked how they know when they've done a good job at work, they might say something like, . Michael Hall considers aspects of a . In some ways, Self/Other Referencing is the opposite of introverted/extroverted. Ironically, Self Referencing is more likely to go with extroversion and Other Referencing is more likely to go with introversion. A person who has appropriate choice and flexibility with regard to whether they are self referencing or other referencing in a particular context is likely to have both self confidence and the ability to take into account the feelings and points of view of others. Other factors are often present when a person self references or other references habitually without a sense of choice. Such factors include self- other confusion, self- concept, and depth of self understanding and awareness. Problems related to the overuse of self or other referencing sometimes self- correct when these other factors are successfully addressed. Therefore, it's generally more useful to address these issues first (i. Attribution Style: Best- Case vs Worst- Case Scenario Thinking. This Meta Program was identified by L. Michael Hall and Bob Bodenhamer who describe it as follows: . Sorting for the best- case scenario orients one in an optimistic, hopeful, goal- oriented, and empowered way. Sorting for the worst- case scenario orients one in a pessimistic, negative, and problem- focused way. While sorting for positive possibilities sounds better than sorting for negative possibilities, both have their usefulness in specific contexts. Like away from thinking, worst- case thinking can be an important capability if specific worst cases are realistically assessed and can be adequately planned for. In some cases, worst case thinking is like a sort of reverse- optimism. That is, if we know we can handle the worst case, anything better that happens will be . It's often cited with a certain wry humor, the benefit of which is that a person may plan more precisely to handle contingencies which may obstruct or interrupt the achievement goals. Frequently, people who sort for the worst case believe they are simply being more realistic than others who sort for the best case. Those who overuse it, without balancing it with its opposite, could be described as looking at the world through rose colored glasses, may naively maintain a . As they increasingly sort for worst- case futures, they may become unable to envision positive outcomes at all, so they may see no point in taking positive actions which could further their self- development, health, career, relationships, and so on. The result is a self- fulfilling negative prophesy which works to undermine a person's progress and happiness. For example, I might notice a slight pain in my finger and think (in worst case style), . People who get themselves into similar patterns often realize that their thinking doesn't make much logical sense, but they don't know how to stop it. It makes perfect sense that, if all I perceive and consider is negative, I will have little evidence on which to base a more positive belief. At the same time, limiting beliefs about capability may self- heal when a person de- generalizes worst case thinking and installs the ability to use best case thinking in a balanced and appropriate way. This effect is due to the fact that the person can now perceive differently and thus become aware of evidence in support of positive possibilities. When they realize they can do that, their beliefs about capability may change. It bears repeating that choice is better than no choice in regard to Meta Programs. A person's health, happiness and effectiveness are greatly enhanced by the ability to have full access to either Meta Program according to what a person considers appropriate and useful in a given context.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
December 2016
Categories |